January 30, 2009 at 12:10 am #63009January 30, 2009 at 7:55 am #90894SuzAndTheDivaMember
Now thats ever so sad I remember the link being posted when he got his ‘cart’ he looked so happy :'( :'( RIP Max :-*January 30, 2009 at 1:48 pm #90895kerrie and stanMember
RIP max :-* so sadJanuary 30, 2009 at 2:16 pm #90896.dodger.Member
aww poor Max, that is so sad :'( Run Free Max :-*January 31, 2009 at 9:24 am #90897Misty23Member
I know Max’s owners and they are so angry at this article it is a load of rubbish, Max did not die because of sniffing cocaine, this is the sun at it’s best, the sun wanted to do an article on Max and his owners agreed but they did what the sun usually does and prints a story to capture headlines and not the truth.January 31, 2009 at 8:36 pm #90898Foxisle_crazyMember
Well i thought it was a bit fishy when i read it the other day. Its not as if he’s sniffing the powder straight up the nose, most of the drugs they search for are tightly packaged, there wouldn’t be any spillage :-\January 31, 2009 at 10:29 pm #90899kendalMember
i do think the title of the article is a bit over dramatic, but as for the article itself, i red it as being the fact that the dogs nose is used more excessively than a pet dog, and also it is being exposed to a verity of different chemicals and substances that is wouldn’t normally be exposed to.
i see was foxy is saying about them not actual snorting it, but a small is lots of particles off the substance just much much finer and then think how sensitive it is compared to ours.
but i do understand how upset the family must be over peoples reactions and miss interpretations of the article.February 1, 2009 at 9:06 am #90900Misty23Member
It was tumours on his joints, I think the paper is going to print a retraction, Max was an insperation to all :-*
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.